Hi Everyone,
I am in New Zealand where the Monarch arrived (presumably blown on a storm) in the 1800s. It wasn't until the early 1900s that Asclepias were introduced. We have two relatively common species: A. physocarpa and A. fruticosa, and there are two other species meant to be available in NZ, but I haven't found a nursery stocking them as yet.
I would like to ask a question about the plant, especially for those who live in countries where it is a wildflower.
I have found that where I once found prolific stands of A. physocarpa and/or A. fruticosa (the only two species that grow easily in this country) after a few years the plants have almost completely died out in that place.
Through those plants growing, seeds will have been scattered along the road and over the hill etc, so it isn't a major problem, I can always find Milkweed, but I was wondering if the plant actually changes the composition of the soil, so that it has become too alkali or acid, and that's why after a few years the plants don't grow in that place... This happens with Pinus radiata - after two or three crops the soil is no good for pine.
Does anyone know of any research that has been conducted that proves or disproves my theory?
We are currently working on restoring an overwintering habitat, and I have been told that Swan Plant was prolific there in the 1960s, but there isn't much there now - and neither are there many butterflies overwintering in the trees there (it's midwinter here in NZ).
Hope someone can assist!
Jacqui
