WSU Monarch Butterfly Project Gets Help from WA Penitentiary

Milkweed restoration, deforestation, reforestation and other issues surrounding the monarch butterfly and its habitat.

Moderator: Monarch Watch

WSU Monarch Butterfly Project Gets Help from WA Penitentiary

Postby Mona Miller » Tue Jul 03, 2012 12:37 pm

http://cahnrsnews.wsu.edu/2012/07/02/ws ... offenders/
WSU Monarch Butterfly Project Underway with Help from Washington State
Penitentiary Offenders

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mFH4_j-84FA
News Video
Mona Miller
Herndon, VA (USA)
Take care of the small things....
User avatar
Mona Miller
Full Monarch Member
 
Posts: 3252
Joined: Thu Aug 19, 2004 10:38 pm
Location: Herndon, VA (USA)

Re: WSU Monarch Butterfly Project Gets Help from WA Penitent

Postby Paul Cherubini » Wed Jul 04, 2012 9:16 am

Today in a message to DesertLeps@yahoogroups.com Bob Pyle explained why he and the Xerces Society do not support the project:

From: Bob Pyle <erebioid@yahoo.com>
Subject: [DesertLeps] Re: Washington releases
Date: July 4, 2012 1:14:40 AM PDT
To: DesertLeps@yahoogroups.com

Dr. James's project involves prison-reared monarchs bred from wild stock captured in northern California. Xerces declined to support it because, though well thought out, it is not consistent with the Society's release policy. Dr. James is a friend and colleague and a superb scientist, author of many papers on monarchs in Australia and co-author of the splendid new book on the life histories of Cascadian butterflies. I tried to look at the positive aspects of the project, including the obvious social benefits from the inmates' involvement, and possible illumination of nectar corridors worthy of protection. However, I cannot support the overall project. While these northern Cal. monarchs may indeed have been bound for Washington ultimately, at least some of them, they still occlude recording of natural events and prevent evaluation of how the Washington population would do this year unassisted. David and I disagree as to whether these imports represent perfect surrogates for natural arrivals. Clearly they're better than farmed monarchs from deep in California; but they are still transfers, with the liabilities that that state implies. I hope something good will come of it, but I feel it is unfortunate that Dr. James found it necessary to bring in monarchs from out of state to accomplish his goals. That's all I have to say about this situation.
User avatar
Paul Cherubini
Chrysalis Club Member
 
Posts: 780
Joined: Thu Oct 07, 2004 12:12 pm
Location: El Dorado, Calif.


Return to Conservation Issues

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests